SEBI has issued a landmark circular on May 5, 2026 (Circular No. HO/47/17/12(8)2025-MRD-POD2) formally specifying the first-ever official list of 'Significant Indices' under the SEBI (Index Providers) Regulations, 2024. The circular identifies 48 indices — including Nifty 50, BSE Sensex, Nifty Bank, and a wide range of debt and hybrid benchmarks — that will now fall under SEBI's formal regulatory oversight. Index Providers administering these indices must apply for SEBI registration within six months from May 5, 2026 — a deadline of November 5, 2026. This circular is the operational trigger that brings the IP Regulations to life — and marks a pivotal shift in how India's rapidly growing passive investing ecosystem is governed.
💡 Circular at a Glance
🏛️ Section 1 — Background: Why Did SEBI Need to Issue This Circular?
The Passive Investing Explosion in India
India's passive fund industry has witnessed extraordinary growth over the past five years. Total AUM in passive investments surged from ₹1.63 lakh crore in 2020 to approximately ₹15 lakh crore in 2026 — a nearly tenfold increase in six years. The number of passive investor folios has surpassed 5 crore (50 million), reflecting broad retail participation. (Source: NSE Indices CEO Aniruddha Chatterjee, press meet, April 2026 — The Tribune)
By December 2025, passive funds constituted approximately 18% of total mutual fund industry AUM — up from just 12% in December 2021. ETF and index fund AUM grew 27% in 2025 alone, moving from ₹11.11 lakh crore in December 2024 to ₹14.07 lakh crore by November 2025. (Source: AMFI data, Angel One / AMFI, December 2025)
Yet, these indices — the Nifty 50, BSE Sensex, Nifty Bank, CRISIL Liquid debt benchmarks — were governed by their providers largely through internal policies with no formal SEBI oversight framework. Index providers could exercise significant discretion in creating, modifying, or restructuring indices that collectively move trillions of rupees in investor assets — with no statutory accountability to investors. (Source: Khaitan & Co analysis on SEBI IP Regulations, April 2024)
The Regulatory Journey — From 2017 to 2026
📌 Why Does Index Governance Matter? The Conflict of Interest Problem
Index providers can exercise discretion in creating or modifying an index — decisions which can directly impact the volume, liquidity, and price of a stock. When a stock is added to or removed from the Nifty 50, for instance, passive funds tracking it must buy or sell those shares — irrespective of fundamental value. This creates concerns about conflict of interest when the index provider has other commercial relationships with the companies being considered for inclusion or exclusion. The IP Regulations — and this circular — are designed to address precisely this governance gap. (Khaitan & Co via Lexology, April 2024)
📋 Section 2 — The IP Regulations Framework: What Was Already in Place?
Before this circular could operationalise them, the SEBI (Index Providers) Regulations, 2024 had already prescribed a comprehensive governance framework for registered Index Providers. Understanding this framework is essential to appreciate what NSE Indices, BSE Index Services, and CRISIL will be required to comply with once registered. (Source: TaxGuru analysis of IP Regulations, July 2024)
📐 Section 3 — Definition of 'Significant Index' and the AUM Threshold
Legal Definition — Regulation 2(1)(u) of IP Regulations
The IP Regulations define 'Significant Indices' as follows — quoted directly from the regulation:
"Indices administered by an Index Provider, which are tracked or benchmarked by domestic mutual fund schemes with the cumulative assets under management exceeding the limits as may be specified from time to time.
Explanation: The list of 'Significant Indices' shall be specified by the Board from time to time."
Regulation 3(1) further limits the applicability of the IP Regulations:
"These regulations shall be applicable only to Index Providers that administer Significant Indices consisting of securities listed on a recognized stock exchange in India for use in the Indian securities market."
The AUM Threshold — As Specified in This Circular (Para 4)
Removal from the List — The 3-Year Continuity Rule (Para 5)
Once included in the Significant Indices list, an index cannot be removed easily. It will remain on the list unless cumulative AUM falls below the ₹20,000 Crore threshold for a continuous period of three years (i.e., six consecutive half-yearly reviews).
✅ Why 3-Year Continuity for Removal?
This "sticky removal" mechanism prevents indices from oscillating in and out of regulated status due to temporary AUM fluctuations — for example, during market downturns or redemption spikes. It provides regulatory stability for index providers and fund houses that have invested in compliance infrastructure around regulated indices. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 5 + consultation paper analysis, TaxGuru, January 2026)
⚡ Section 4 — Key Obligations: What Must Be Done Now?
Obligation 1 — SEBI Registration Within 6 Months (Para 7)
Every Index Provider administering any of the 48 Significant Indices in Annexure-A must submit a registration application to SEBI under Regulation 4 of the IP Regulations within 6 months from May 5, 2026 — i.e., by November 5, 2026.
⏰ Critical Deadline — November 5, 2026
NSE Indices Limited, BSE Index Services Pvt. Ltd., and CRISIL — the three providers responsible for all 48 Significant Indices — must all apply for formal SEBI registration by this date. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 7)
Who Is Exempt from Registration? (Para 7 — Two Exceptions)
The registration requirement does not apply to an Index Provider if all of its Significant Indices fall under either of these categories:
⚠️ "All or None" Rule — Exception Applies Only If ALL Indices Qualify
The exemption applies only when every single Significant Index provided by that Index Provider falls under the RBI framework — not just some. If even one index on Annexure-A is not an RBI-regulated benchmark, the provider must register with SEBI. Additionally, per the footnote in Annexure-A, any index on the SEBI list that is also notified as an RBI Significant Benchmark or Authorised Benchmark shall be excluded from IP Regulations — even while remaining on the SEBI list. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 7 and Annexure-A footnote)
Obligation 2 — Existing Providers May Continue Operating During Transition (Para 8)
Any Index Provider already administering Significant Indices as on May 5, 2026 may continue its Index Provider activity without interruption during the 6-month registration window, provided it submits a registration application within that period. This ensures no disruption to the functioning of indices, fund benchmarks, or market operations during the transition. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 8)
Obligation 3 — Departmental Index Operations Must Be Separated into a New Legal Entity Within 2 Years (Para 9)
❌ Current Position (the Problem)
Some SEBI-registered entities (e.g., stock exchanges, credit rating agencies, clearing corporations) also provide Significant Indices as a departmental function — i.e., as an internal division rather than a separate legal entity. This creates structural conflicts of interest and blurs regulatory accountability between the entity's primary SEBI-regulated role and its index administration function.
✅ New Requirement
Such entities must form a separate legal entity to carry out Index Provider activities within 2 years from May 5, 2026 — i.e., by May 5, 2028. This structural separation ring-fences index operations from other regulated businesses and eliminates cross-functional conflicts of interest. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 9)
Obligation 4 — Grievance Redressal Now Available for Index Subscribers (Para 10)
The circular clarifies that the grievance redressal mechanism under Regulation 23 of IP Regulations applies only to Significant Indices provided by SEBI-registered Index Providers. Once registration is completed, subscribers to those indices will have a formal statutory mechanism to raise complaints — a right that previously did not exist. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 10; Outlook Money, January 2026)
📅 Section 5 — Key Timelines at a Glance
📊 Section 6 — Annexure-A: The 48 Significant Indices (Complete Official List)
The first official list — based on AUM data for July 1 to December 31, 2025 — comprises 48 indices across three providers: NSE Indices Limited (31 indices), BSE Index Services Pvt. Ltd. (9 indices), and CRISIL (8 indices). (Source: SEBI Circular Annexure-A)
BSE Index Services Pvt. Ltd. — 9 Indices
CRISIL — 8 Indices
NSE Indices Limited — 31 Indices
🔄 Section 7 — Before vs After: What This Circular Changes
👥 Section 8 — Who Is Affected and What Must They Do?
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. What exactly is the AUM threshold for an index to qualify as 'Significant'?
Per Para 4 of the circular, a Benchmark or Index is 'Significant' if its daily average cumulative AUM tracked across all domestic mutual fund schemes exceeds ₹20,000 Crore for each of the past six months ending June 30 or December 31. The key word is "each" — the threshold must be sustained every single month of the half-year, not just on average. A temporary spike crossing ₹20,000 Cr is not sufficient; consistent sustained tracking AUM is required. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 4)
Q2. Once on the list, how long before an index can be removed?
An index remains on the Significant Indices list until its cumulative AUM falls below the ₹20,000 Crore threshold for a continuous period of three years — meaning six consecutive half-yearly reviews must all show sub-threshold AUM. A single below-threshold reading does not trigger removal. This stability mechanism prevents compliance churn from temporary market AUM fluctuations. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 5)
Q3. Can NSE Indices / BSE Index Services / CRISIL continue operating while their registration application is pending?
Yes, explicitly. Para 8 of the circular states that any Index Provider providing Significant Indices as on the date of the circular (May 5, 2026) may continue its Index Provider activity during the 6-month application window — provided it submits a registration application to SEBI within those 6 months. There is no disruption to existing indices, fund benchmarks, or market operations during the transition. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 8)
Q4. What happens if an Index Provider misses the November 5, 2026 registration deadline?
The circular does not specify a penalty in this circular itself, but under the SEBI (IP) Regulations, 2024 and the SEBI Act, operating as an unregistered Index Provider after the prescribed period would constitute a violation of the regulations, potentially exposing the provider to action under the SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008. SEBI retains broad powers to impose penalties, deregister, or take other action for non-compliance. Index Providers should treat this deadline as non-negotiable.
Q5. Does this circular apply to MSCI India or other global index providers?
Not directly. The IP Regulations — and this circular — apply only to Index Providers administering Significant Indices consisting of securities listed on a recognised Indian stock exchange for use in the Indian securities market. Global providers whose indices consist of global assets, or are used exclusively in foreign jurisdictions, are exempt. However, if a global provider administers India-specific indices that are tracked by domestic mutual funds above the ₹20,000 Crore threshold, those indices would fall within scope. (Source: IP Regulations Regulation 3(1); Business Standard, March 2024)
Q6. As a mutual fund investor in a Nifty 50 index fund — what changes for me practically?
Two practical improvements: (1) Better governance transparency — once NSE Indices registers with SEBI, it must publicly disclose its methodology documents, constituent change information, and maintain a conflict of interest policy and independent oversight committee. This means you will have access to clearer explanations of why stocks are added to or removed from the Nifty 50, and there will be greater checks against opaque or conflicted index decisions. (2) Formal complaint mechanism — if you believe Nifty 50's administration has been unfair or non-compliant, you now have a statutory grievance channel under Regulation 23 of the IP Regulations. (Source: Outlook Money, January 2026)
Q7. How is AUM calculated for an index that is used in multiple types of schemes — e.g., both an index fund and a hybrid fund?
For schemes that track multiple indices or benchmarks simultaneously, the AUM is attributed proportionally based on each index's weight in the scheme's overall benchmark. For an index of indices (e.g., a hybrid composite of equity + debt indices), the AUM tracking each underlying index is included in proportion to its weight. This methodology prevents double-counting while ensuring the full economic significance of each index is correctly reflected in its AUM calculation. (Source: SEBI Consultation Paper on Significant Indices, January 2026 — TaxGuru)
Q8. Why are debt and hybrid indices like CRISIL Liquid Overnight or Nifty 1D Rate included alongside equity indices like Nifty 50?
The definition of Significant Indices in the IP Regulations is AUM-agnostic with respect to asset class — it applies to any benchmark tracked by domestic mutual fund schemes exceeding ₹20,000 Crore. Liquid fund and overnight fund categories collectively hold enormous AUM because they are widely used by corporations, institutions, and individuals for short-term cash parking. The CRISIL Liquid Overnight and Nifty 1D Rate indices easily clear the ₹20,000 Crore threshold. Their inclusion recognises that governance failures in debt benchmarks can be just as harmful to investors as governance failures in equity indices — as India learned from the LIBOR manipulation scandal internationally. (Source: Khaitan & Co, SEBI IP Regulations analysis, April 2024)
📝 Bottom Line
SEBI's May 5, 2026 circular completes the long-pending operationalisation of the SEBI (Index Providers) Regulations, 2024. India's passive investment AUM has grown from ₹1.63 lakh crore in 2020 to approximately ₹15 lakh crore in 2026 — driven by over 5 crore investor folios — making the governance of index providers a matter of systemic importance, not merely a regulatory formality. (Tribune India / NSE Indices, April 2026) By formally specifying the ₹20,000 Crore AUM threshold and publishing the first list of 48 Significant Indices, SEBI has created clear accountability for NSE Indices, BSE Index Services, and CRISIL — three providers that underpin the benchmarks of the vast majority of India's passive fund industry. The key takeaways: registration by November 5, 2026; departmental index operations must be structurally separated by May 5, 2028; the 3-year continuity rule protects against abrupt list changes; and for the first time, investors have a formal grievance mechanism for index administration. This is a landmark step in the maturation of India's capital markets.
Primary Source: SEBI Circular No. HO/47/17/12(8)2025-MRD-POD2 dated May 05, 2026, issued by Sanjay Singh Bhati, General Manager, SEBI. Available at sebi.gov.in under "Legal Framework – Circulars." | Additional Sources: NSE Indices Press Meet / The Tribune (April 2026); AMFI / Angel One (December 2025); SEBI Consultation Paper (January 2026, TaxGuru); Khaitan & Co / Lexology (April 2024); Business Standard (March 2024); Outlook Money (January 2026). This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or investment advice.


