SEBI has issued a landmark circular on May 5, 2026 (Circular No. HO/47/17/12(8)2025-MRD-POD2) formally specifying the first-ever official list of 'Significant Indices' under the SEBI (Index Providers) Regulations, 2024. The circular identifies 48 indices — including Nifty 50, BSE Sensex, Nifty Bank, and a wide range of debt and hybrid benchmarks — that will now fall under SEBI's formal regulatory oversight. Index Providers administering these indices must apply for SEBI registration within six months from May 5, 2026 — a deadline of November 5, 2026. This circular is the operational trigger that brings the IP Regulations to life — and marks a pivotal shift in how India's rapidly growing passive investing ecosystem is governed.
💡 Circular at a Glance
| Circular Number | HO/47/17/12(8)2025-MRD-POD2 |
| Date of Issue | May 05, 2026 |
| Issued By | Sanjay Singh Bhati, General Manager, SEBI (Tel: 022-26449222) |
| Addressed To | All Index Providers, All Stock Exchanges, All Mutual Funds, All AMCs, AMFI |
| Legal Authority | Section 11(1) of SEBI Act, 1992 + Regulation 38 + Regulation 2(1)(u) of IP Regulations |
| Effective Date | Immediate effect from May 05, 2026 |
| Total Significant Indices | 48 Indices (Annexure-A) |
| Registration Deadline | November 5, 2026 (6 months) |
🏛️ Section 1 — Background: Why Did SEBI Need to Issue This Circular?
The Passive Investing Explosion in India
India's passive fund industry has witnessed extraordinary growth over the past five years. Total AUM in passive investments surged from ₹1.63 lakh crore in 2020 to approximately ₹15 lakh crore in 2026 — a nearly tenfold increase in six years. The number of passive investor folios has surpassed 5 crore (50 million), reflecting broad retail participation. (Source: NSE Indices CEO Aniruddha Chatterjee, press meet, April 2026 — The Tribune)
By December 2025, passive funds constituted approximately 18% of total mutual fund industry AUM — up from just 12% in December 2021. ETF and index fund AUM grew 27% in 2025 alone, moving from ₹11.11 lakh crore in December 2024 to ₹14.07 lakh crore by November 2025. (Source: AMFI data, Angel One / AMFI, December 2025)
Yet, these indices — the Nifty 50, BSE Sensex, Nifty Bank, CRISIL Liquid debt benchmarks — were governed by their providers largely through internal policies with no formal SEBI oversight framework. Index providers could exercise significant discretion in creating, modifying, or restructuring indices that collectively move trillions of rupees in investor assets — with no statutory accountability to investors. (Source: Khaitan & Co analysis on SEBI IP Regulations, April 2024)
The Regulatory Journey — From 2017 to 2026
| Year | Milestone |
|---|---|
| 2017 | SEBI published first discussion paper on a code of conduct for Index Providers — signalling intent to regulate (Khaitan & Co) |
| 2024 | SEBI notified the SEBI (Index Providers) Regulations, 2024 on March 8, 2024 — establishing governance framework, but requiring 'Significant Indices' list to operationalise (Business Standard, March 2024) |
| Jan 2026 | SEBI issued consultation paper proposing ₹20,000 Cr AUM threshold and provisional list of 47 indices for public comments until February 10, 2026 (TaxGuru / SEBI, January 2026) |
| May 5, 2026 | ✅ Final circular issued — AUM threshold formalised, first official list of 48 Significant Indices published, registration obligations triggered (Source: SEBI Circular HO/47/17/12(8)2025-MRD-POD2) |
📌 Why Does Index Governance Matter? The Conflict of Interest Problem
Index providers can exercise discretion in creating or modifying an index — decisions which can directly impact the volume, liquidity, and price of a stock. When a stock is added to or removed from the Nifty 50, for instance, passive funds tracking it must buy or sell those shares — irrespective of fundamental value. This creates concerns about conflict of interest when the index provider has other commercial relationships with the companies being considered for inclusion or exclusion. The IP Regulations — and this circular — are designed to address precisely this governance gap. (Khaitan & Co via Lexology, April 2024)
📋 Section 2 — The IP Regulations Framework: What Was Already in Place?
Before this circular could operationalise them, the SEBI (Index Providers) Regulations, 2024 had already prescribed a comprehensive governance framework for registered Index Providers. Understanding this framework is essential to appreciate what NSE Indices, BSE Index Services, and CRISIL will be required to comply with once registered. (Source: TaxGuru analysis of IP Regulations, July 2024)
| Requirement Under IP Regulations | Details |
|---|---|
| Registration with SEBI | Every Index Provider administering Significant Indices must hold a SEBI-issued certificate of registration under Regulation 4 |
| Independent Oversight Committee | Must constitute an independent committee to govern all aspects of benchmark determination — separate from day-to-day index calculation/maintenance operations |
| Conflict of Interest Policy | Mandatory policies and procedures to protect integrity and independence of index-related functions |
| Control Framework | Documented framework for calculating, maintaining, and disseminating the index — available to SEBI on request |
| Methodology Disclosure | Must publicly disclose (a) data input guidelines and calculation methodology; (b) changes in index constituents |
| Code of Conduct | Modelled on IOSCO principles — maintaining objectivity, adequate disclosures, periodic review, preventing misuse of privileged information, preventing market manipulation |
| Compliance Officer | Must appoint a compliance officer responsible for monitoring compliance with SEBI Act, rules, regulations, and circulars |
| Whistle-Blower Mechanism | Effective whistle-blowing mechanism to facilitate early awareness of potential misconduct |
| Grievance Redressal | Under Regulation 23 — subscribers to Significant Indices have formal recourse to raise complaints |
📐 Section 3 — Definition of 'Significant Index' and the AUM Threshold
Legal Definition — Regulation 2(1)(u) of IP Regulations
The IP Regulations define 'Significant Indices' as follows — quoted directly from the regulation:
"Indices administered by an Index Provider, which are tracked or benchmarked by domestic mutual fund schemes with the cumulative assets under management exceeding the limits as may be specified from time to time.
Explanation: The list of 'Significant Indices' shall be specified by the Board from time to time."
Regulation 3(1) further limits the applicability of the IP Regulations:
"These regulations shall be applicable only to Index Providers that administer Significant Indices consisting of securities listed on a recognized stock exchange in India for use in the Indian securities market."
The AUM Threshold — As Specified in This Circular (Para 4)
| Parameter | Specification (from Circular Para 4) |
|---|---|
| AUM Threshold | Daily average cumulative AUM tracking the Benchmark or Index across all Mutual Fund schemes must exceed ₹20,000 Crore |
| Measurement Basis | The threshold must be exceeded for each of the past six months, ending on 30th June and 31st December of each year — every single month in the half-year period must clear the threshold |
| Coverage | Any Benchmark or Index based on listed securities — including index of indices |
| Review Frequency | Half-yearly — based on data ending June 30 and December 31 each year |
| First List Based On | AUM data for July 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025 |
Removal from the List — The 3-Year Continuity Rule (Para 5)
Once included in the Significant Indices list, an index cannot be removed easily. It will remain on the list unless cumulative AUM falls below the ₹20,000 Crore threshold for a continuous period of three years (i.e., six consecutive half-yearly reviews).
✅ Why 3-Year Continuity for Removal?
This "sticky removal" mechanism prevents indices from oscillating in and out of regulated status due to temporary AUM fluctuations — for example, during market downturns or redemption spikes. It provides regulatory stability for index providers and fund houses that have invested in compliance infrastructure around regulated indices. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 5 + consultation paper analysis, TaxGuru, January 2026)
⚡ Section 4 — Key Obligations: What Must Be Done Now?
Obligation 1 — SEBI Registration Within 6 Months (Para 7)
Every Index Provider administering any of the 48 Significant Indices in Annexure-A must submit a registration application to SEBI under Regulation 4 of the IP Regulations within 6 months from May 5, 2026 — i.e., by November 5, 2026.
⏰ Critical Deadline — November 5, 2026
NSE Indices Limited, BSE Index Services Pvt. Ltd., and CRISIL — the three providers responsible for all 48 Significant Indices — must all apply for formal SEBI registration by this date. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 7)
Who Is Exempt from Registration? (Para 7 — Two Exceptions)
The registration requirement does not apply to an Index Provider if all of its Significant Indices fall under either of these categories:
| Exception | Condition | Legal Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Exception (a) | All Significant Indices are notified by RBI as 'Significant Benchmarks' | RBI directions under Section 45W of the RBI Act, 1934 |
| Exception (b) | All Significant Indices are classified by RBI as 'Authorized Benchmarks' | RBI directions under Section 45W of the RBI Act, 1934 |
⚠️ "All or None" Rule — Exception Applies Only If ALL Indices Qualify
The exemption applies only when every single Significant Index provided by that Index Provider falls under the RBI framework — not just some. If even one index on Annexure-A is not an RBI-regulated benchmark, the provider must register with SEBI. Additionally, per the footnote in Annexure-A, any index on the SEBI list that is also notified as an RBI Significant Benchmark or Authorised Benchmark shall be excluded from IP Regulations — even while remaining on the SEBI list. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 7 and Annexure-A footnote)
Obligation 2 — Existing Providers May Continue Operating During Transition (Para 8)
Any Index Provider already administering Significant Indices as on May 5, 2026 may continue its Index Provider activity without interruption during the 6-month registration window, provided it submits a registration application within that period. This ensures no disruption to the functioning of indices, fund benchmarks, or market operations during the transition. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 8)
Obligation 3 — Departmental Index Operations Must Be Separated into a New Legal Entity Within 2 Years (Para 9)
❌ Current Position (the Problem)
Some SEBI-registered entities (e.g., stock exchanges, credit rating agencies, clearing corporations) also provide Significant Indices as a departmental function — i.e., as an internal division rather than a separate legal entity. This creates structural conflicts of interest and blurs regulatory accountability between the entity's primary SEBI-regulated role and its index administration function.
✅ New Requirement
Such entities must form a separate legal entity to carry out Index Provider activities within 2 years from May 5, 2026 — i.e., by May 5, 2028. This structural separation ring-fences index operations from other regulated businesses and eliminates cross-functional conflicts of interest. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 9)
Obligation 4 — Grievance Redressal Now Available for Index Subscribers (Para 10)
The circular clarifies that the grievance redressal mechanism under Regulation 23 of IP Regulations applies only to Significant Indices provided by SEBI-registered Index Providers. Once registration is completed, subscribers to those indices will have a formal statutory mechanism to raise complaints — a right that previously did not exist. (Source: SEBI Circular Para 10; Outlook Money, January 2026)
📅 Section 5 — Key Timelines at a Glance
| Event | Date / Deadline | Para Ref |
|---|---|---|
| SEBI (IP) Regulations, 2024 notified | March 8, 2024 | — |
| Consultation paper on AUM threshold issued | January 19, 2026 (public comments by Feb 10, 2026) | — |
| This Circular issued; comes into force | May 05, 2026 (immediate effect) | Para 11 |
| AUM data period for first Significant Indices list | July 1, 2025 – December 31, 2025 | Para 6 |
| ⏰ Registration application deadline | November 5, 2026 (6 months from May 5, 2026) | Para 7 |
| ⏰ Structural separation deadline | May 5, 2028 (2 years from May 5, 2026) | Para 9 |
| Next half-yearly AUM review (to add indices) | Based on data ending June 30, 2026 | Para 4 |
| Earliest possible removal from list | Only after 3 continuous years below threshold (6 consecutive half-yearly reviews) | Para 5 |
📊 Section 6 — Annexure-A: The 48 Significant Indices (Complete Official List)
The first official list — based on AUM data for July 1 to December 31, 2025 — comprises 48 indices across three providers: NSE Indices Limited (31 indices), BSE Index Services Pvt. Ltd. (9 indices), and CRISIL (8 indices). (Source: SEBI Circular Annexure-A)
BSE Index Services Pvt. Ltd. — 9 Indices
| Sr. | Index Name | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | BSE 100 | Broad Market Equity |
| 2 | BSE 200 | Broad Market Equity |
| 3 | BSE 250 Smallcap | Small Cap Equity |
| 4 | BSE 500 | Broad Market Equity |
| 5 | BSE Healthcare | Sectoral / Thematic |
| 6 | BSE India Infrastructure | Sectoral / Thematic |
| 7 | BSE 150 Midcap | Mid Cap Equity |
| 8 | BSE Sensex | Headline / Flagship Index |
| 9 | BSE Teck | Sectoral / Thematic |
CRISIL — 8 Indices
| Sr. | Index Name | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 – Aggressive | Hybrid |
| 11 | CRISIL Hybrid 50+50 – Moderate | Hybrid |
| 12 | CRISIL Liquid Debt A I | Debt / Liquid |
| 13 | CRISIL Liquid Overnight | Debt / Overnight |
| 14 | CRISIL Low Duration Debt A-I | Debt |
| 15 | CRISIL Money Market A-I | Debt / Money Market |
| 16 | CRISIL Short Duration Debt A-II | Debt |
| 17 | CRISIL Ultra Short Duration Debt A-I | Debt |
NSE Indices Limited — 31 Indices
| Sr. | Index Name | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Nifty 100 | Broad Market Equity |
| 19 | Nifty 1D Rate | Debt / Overnight Rate |
| 20 | Nifty 200 | Broad Market Equity |
| 21 | Nifty 50 | Headline / Flagship Index |
| 22 | Nifty 50 Arbitrage | Strategy |
| 23 | Nifty 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 50:50 | Hybrid |
| 24 | Nifty 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 65:35 | Hybrid |
| 25 | Nifty 500 | Broad Market Equity |
| 26 | Nifty All Duration G-Sec | Debt / G-Sec |
| 27 | Nifty Bank | Sectoral (Banking) |
| 28 | Nifty Banking & PSU Debt A-II | Debt |
| 29 | Nifty BHARAT Bond – April 2030 | Debt / Target Maturity |
| 30 | Nifty Composite Debt | Debt |
| 31 | Nifty Composite Debt A-III | Debt |
| 32 | Nifty Corporate Bond A-II | Debt |
| 33 | Nifty CPSE | Sectoral / Thematic (PSU) |
| 34 | Nifty Equity Savings | Hybrid |
| 35 | Nifty Financial Services | Sectoral (BFSI) |
| 36 | Nifty India Consumption | Thematic |
| 37 | Nifty India Manufacturing | Thematic |
| 38 | Nifty Infrastructure | Sectoral / Thematic |
| 39 | Nifty LargeMidcap 250 | Broad Market Equity |
| 40 | Nifty Liquid A-I | Debt / Liquid |
| 41 | Nifty Low Duration Debt A-I | Debt |
| 42 | Nifty Midcap 150 | Mid Cap Equity |
| 43 | Nifty Money Market A-I | Debt / Money Market |
| 44 | Nifty Next 50 | Broad Market Equity |
| 45 | Nifty Short Duration Debt A-II | Debt |
| 46 | Nifty Smallcap 250 | Small Cap Equity |
| 47 | Nifty Ultra Short Duration Debt A-I | Debt |
| 48 | Nifty500 Multicap 50:25:25 | Broad Market Equity |
🔄 Section 7 — Before vs After: What This Circular Changes
| Aspect | Before (Pre-May 5, 2026) | After (Post-May 5, 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| AUM Threshold | Not specified — Significant Indices list could not be finalised | Formally set at ₹20,000 Cr daily average AUM for each of 6 months |
| Official Significant Indices List | Did not exist — IP Regulations operationally incomplete | 48 indices officially specified in Annexure-A |
| IP Regulations Applicability | Could not be triggered without the Significant Indices list | Fully operative for all 48 listed indices |
| SEBI Registration of NSE/BSE/CRISIL | Not required under SEBI in Index Provider capacity | Must apply for SEBI registration by November 5, 2026 |
| Investor Grievance on Index Admin | No formal statutory mechanism existed for investors | Regulation 23 grievance mechanism available post-registration |
| Methodology Transparency | Internal policies only; no public disclosure mandate | Post-registration: public disclosure of methodology documents and constituent change information is mandatory |
| Departmental Index Operations | Permitted — no structural separation requirement | Must be separated into a distinct legal entity by May 5, 2028 |
| Conflict of Interest Framework | Voluntary; no regulator-mandated policies | Mandatory conflict of interest policies, independent oversight committee, and whistle-blower mechanism required post-registration |
👥 Section 8 — Who Is Affected and What Must They Do?
| Stakeholder | Impact | Immediate Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| NSE Indices Limited (31 indices on list) | Largest number of Significant Indices including Nifty 50, Nifty Bank, all debt/hybrid NSE indices | Apply for SEBI registration by November 5, 2026; set up independent oversight committee, conflict of interest policy, compliance officer |
| BSE Index Services Pvt. Ltd. (9 indices on list) | BSE Sensex, BSE 100/200/500, sectoral indices — all now regulated | Apply for SEBI registration by November 5, 2026; implement IP Regulations governance framework |
| CRISIL (8 indices on list) | Primarily debt and hybrid benchmarks used widely in mutual fund schemes | Apply for SEBI registration by November 5, 2026; evaluate whether any indices may qualify for RBI exemption |
| Mutual Funds / AMCs | Benchmark and tracking indices now formally regulated; methodology disclosures become mandatory for providers; grievance redressal available | Monitor registration status of index providers; note Regulation 23 grievance recourse now available for Significant Indices; no immediate structural changes required |
| Stock Exchanges / Other SEBI-Registered Entities running Index Operations Departmentally | Must structurally separate index operations into a distinct legal entity | Begin planning separation process; complete incorporation of separate entity and transfer of index business by May 5, 2028 |
| Index Subscribers / Investors | First-ever statutory grievance redressal available; better methodology transparency; stronger governance of index providers | No immediate action required; use Regulation 23 once providers are SEBI-registered |
| Global Index Providers (MSCI, FTSE, Nasdaq, etc.) | Not directly impacted if their India-specific indices are used primarily by overseas investors or are exclusively for foreign jurisdictions | Assess whether any India-listed-securities indices are benchmarked by domestic mutual fund schemes crossing the ₹20,000 Cr threshold; take legal advice if applicable |
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
📝 Bottom Line
SEBI's May 5, 2026 circular completes the long-pending operationalisation of the SEBI (Index Providers) Regulations, 2024. India's passive investment AUM has grown from ₹1.63 lakh crore in 2020 to approximately ₹15 lakh crore in 2026 — driven by over 5 crore investor folios — making the governance of index providers a matter of systemic importance, not merely a regulatory formality. (Tribune India / NSE Indices, April 2026) By formally specifying the ₹20,000 Crore AUM threshold and publishing the first list of 48 Significant Indices, SEBI has created clear accountability for NSE Indices, BSE Index Services, and CRISIL — three providers that underpin the benchmarks of the vast majority of India's passive fund industry. The key takeaways: registration by November 5, 2026; departmental index operations must be structurally separated by May 5, 2028; the 3-year continuity rule protects against abrupt list changes; and for the first time, investors have a formal grievance mechanism for index administration. This is a landmark step in the maturation of India's capital markets.
Primary Source: SEBI Circular No. HO/47/17/12(8)2025-MRD-POD2 dated May 05, 2026, issued by Sanjay Singh Bhati, General Manager, SEBI. Available at sebi.gov.in under "Legal Framework – Circulars." | Additional Sources: NSE Indices Press Meet / The Tribune (April 2026); AMFI / Angel One (December 2025); SEBI Consultation Paper (January 2026, TaxGuru); Khaitan & Co / Lexology (April 2024); Business Standard (March 2024); Outlook Money (January 2026). This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or investment advice.


