Issuing Authority: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) ย |ย Date of Issue: 9th July 2026 ย |ย Applicable From: Date of Issue ย |ย Extends PGIRP form filing deadline to 30th September 2026
Quick Reference โ Circular No. IBBI/II/104/2026
IBBI Circular 104/2026 โ Why the PGIRP Filing Deadline Was Extended
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has, through Circular No. IBBI/II/104/2026 dated 9th July 2026, extended the deadline for filing forms that monitor insolvency resolution processes for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The circular is addressed to all Registered Insolvency Professionals, all Recognised Insolvency Professional Entities, and all Registered Insolvency Professional Agencies, and takes effect immediately.
The extension relates to PGIRP-1 to PGIRP-6, a set of electronic forms that IBBI mandated via an earlier circular โ Circular No. IBBI/II/92/2026 dated 6th March 2026 โ to track the progress of personal guarantor insolvency resolution processes on its electronic platform. Paragraph 9 of that earlier circular had prescribed staggered timelines running from 31st March 2026 to 30th June 2026, depending on the stage each case had reached, with penalties for delayed or incorrect submission applicable only after 30th June 2026.
Old PGIRP deadline: 30th June 2026 ย โย New PGIRP deadline: 30th September 2026. Penalties now apply only after the revised date.
Circular 104/2026 does two things at once: it pushes the compliance deadline out by three months, and it simultaneously tightens the Board's expectations on the quality and accuracy of the data being filed.
Background โ The PGIRP Forms and the Original Timeline
The PGIRP-1 to PGIRP-6 forms were introduced so that IBBI could track, in real time, how far each personal guarantor insolvency case had progressed rather than relying on periodic manual reporting. Circular No. IBBI/II/92/2026 tied specific filing windows to the stage a case had reached โ the first falling due from 31st March 2026, the last by 30th June 2026 โ and made clear that penalties for late or incorrect filings would only bite after that 30th June 2026 cut-off.
PGIRP-1 to PGIRP-6 โ a set of electronic forms filed on the IBBI platform by Insolvency Professionals to monitor the insolvency resolution process for personal guarantors to corporate debtors, at various stages of that process.
Reason for Extension โ Representations from IPs and IPAs
Insolvency Professionals (IPs) and Insolvency Professional Agencies (IPAs) had pushed back on the original timeline, and paragraph 2 of the circular records why: they cited technicalities, difficulties, and the transitional time required to familiarize themselves with the electronic platform and the process of submitting the forms.
Considering these representations and the practical difficulties faced by stakeholders, the Board decided, per paragraph 3, to extend the filing timelines.
The Extension โ New Deadline and Penalty Trigger
The last date for submission of all applicable PGIRP forms as per paragraph 9 of Circular No. IBBI/II/92/2026 is extended till 30th September 2026. Correspondingly, penalties for delayed submission or modification of these forms shall now be levied only after 30th September 2026.
Original filing window: 31st March 2026 โ 30th June 2026. Original penalty trigger: after 30th June 2026. Revised last date for all applicable PGIRP forms: 30th September 2026. Revised penalty trigger: after 30th September 2026. Circular issue date: 9th July 2026.
PGIRP Data Accuracy Directive โ IBBI Cracks Down on Placeholder Entries
The Board isn't only relaxing the clock โ paragraph 4 flags a data quality problem it has spotted along the way: some IPs have been submitting incorrect or incomplete information in electronic forms, including the practice of entering zero values across mandatory fields simply to complete the submission.
IPs are strictly directed to ensure that all information submitted via the PGIRP forms is accurate, truthful, and entirely consistent with the supporting documents attached thereto. Timely and precise filing remains the sole responsibility of the IP.
Clarifications and Technical Support
Stakeholders with questions can start with the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) available on www.ibbi.gov.in, per paragraph 5 of the circular. Technical issues during electronic filing can be reported directly to [email protected].
Statutory Basis
The circular is issued in exercise of the powers conferred under clause (aa) of sub-section (1) of section 196 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It is signed by Jithesh John, Executive Director.
Key Changes โ Old vs New PGIRP Filing Timeline
Compliance Checklist โ PGIRP Filing Extension
โ Identify all personal guarantor insolvency resolution matters requiring PGIRP-1 to PGIRP-6 filings, and their current stage.
โ Complete all pending or partially filed PGIRP forms well before the revised deadline of 30th September 2026.
โ Review previously submitted PGIRP forms for zero-value or placeholder entries in mandatory fields, and correct them where possible.
โ Cross-check every PGIRP submission against underlying case records and supporting documents before filing.
โ Bookmark the FAQs on www.ibbi.gov.in and use [email protected] for platform-related technical issues.
โ Update internal compliance trackers to reflect that penalties now apply only after 30th September 2026, not 30th June 2026.
โ Brief all IPs within the IPE/IPA on the accuracy directive in paragraph 4, since filing responsibility rests solely with the individual IP.
CorpLawUpdates Analysis
Circular 104/2026 reads as a two-part message from IBBI: relief on timing, but a tightening on quality. The three-month extension is a straightforward response to a new electronic filing system that stakeholders found difficult to navigate in its first cycle โ a familiar pattern whenever a regulator rolls out a fresh platform-based compliance requirement. What is more significant for practitioners is paragraph 4, which shows the Board is already actively reviewing the substance of what has been filed, not just whether something was filed at all.
The specific callout of IPs entering zero values in mandatory fields to force a submission through is a pointed signal. It suggests the Board's monitoring of personal guarantor insolvency data has matured to the point where it can detect low-quality filings, and that it intends to treat inaccurate filings as a compliance failure in their own right, independent of the extended deadline.
For IPs, IPEs, and IPAs, the practical challenge is to avoid treating this extension purely as more time to file the same way as before. The Board has effectively raised the bar on what counts as a compliant filing at the same time as it relaxed the clock, meaning firms should use the additional runway to audit and correct earlier submissions, not merely to delay pending ones.
Looking ahead, practitioners should watch for whether IBBI issues further guidance or FAQs specifically addressing common PGIRP data-entry errors, and should not assume a second extension will follow if platform difficulties persist closer to 30th September 2026.
This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or regulatory advice. Verify with primary regulatory sources before acting.


