Skip to main content

Key Change

23 mandatory report items; VRIN on every page; 3 asset-class templates (L&B, P&M, Securities); Coordinating Valuer framework with synergy formula; 7 receivables parameters

IBBI Valuation Guidelines 2026: Standardised Formats, Coordinating Valuer Framework & 23-Point Report Standard Under IBC

CL

Editorial team

CorpLawUpdates.in ยท Professionals & compliance specialists

Verified for complianceLast verified: 17 June 2026
24 min read3,291 wordsSource: Guidelines for Conducting Valu...Effective: 15 June 2026Last amended: 15 June 2026High impact43 views

Summary

IBBI's Circular IBBI/RV/103/2026 dated June 15, 2026 prescribes standardised valuation report formats for all IBC processes. Key changes include 23 mandatory report items, VRIN on every page, seven receivables parameters, and a formal Coordinating Valuer framework with FVCD = ฮฃ(VRV) + S formula.

Quick AnswerAI

IBBI circular IBBI/RV/103/2026 dated June 15, 2026 prescribes guidelines for conducting valuation under IBC 2016. Applies to CIRP, Liquidation, Voluntary Liquidation, PPIRP, and Personal Guarantor Bankruptcy. Mandates 23 minimum content items in all valuation reports, VRIN on every page footer, seven parameters for receivables valuation, and three standardised asset-class report formats for Land & Building, Plant & Machinery, and Securities or Financial Assets. Introduces formal Coordinating Valuer role designated by IP in consultation with CoC; Coordinating Valuer determines Fair Value of Corporate Debtor using FVCD = ฮฃ(VRV) + S where S captures synergies and intangibles. Six duties codified for asset-class RVs toward Coordinating Valuer. Effective immediately. Issued under Section 196, IBC 2016 read with Regulation 35, CIRP Regulations 2016.

Key Takeaways

  • All IBC valuation reports must now have 23 mandatory items and VRIN on every page
  • Three standardised templates prescribed: Land & Building, Plant & Machinery, Securities
  • Receivables must be assessed on 7 specific parameters including ageing, credit risk, and enforceability
  • Coordinating Valuer now formally determines Fair Value of the Corporate Debtor as a whole using FVCD = ฮฃ(VRV) + S
  • Synergies, intangibles (brand, patents, licences, goodwill) must be explicitly assessed and documented
  • Asset-class RVs have six codified duties toward the Coordinating Valuer
  • Zero-value or omitted assets require specific written justification
  • Applies across CIRP, Liquidation, VLP, PPIRP, and Personal Guarantor Bankruptcy
IBBI Circular June 15, 2026 โ€“ Guidelines for Conducting Valuation Under IBC 2016

๐Ÿ“Œ Key Facts at a Glance

IBBI/RV/103/2026
Circular Number
Jun 15, 2026
Date of Issue
Immediate
Effective From
3 Asset Classes
L&B ยท P&M ยท Securities
23 Minimum
Contents in Valuation Report
VRIN Mandatory
On Every Report Page

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has issued Circular No. IBBI/RV/103/2026 dated June 15, 2026, specifying comprehensive Guidelines for Conducting Valuation Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the "Guidelines"). The circular, signed by B. Sankaranarayanan, General Manager, is addressed to all Registered Valuers, Registered Valuer Entities, Registered Valuer Organisations, Registered Insolvency Professionals, Registered Insolvency Professional Entities, and Registered Insolvency Professional Agencies. It comes into force with immediate effect and applies to all valuations conducted under the Code thereafter.

The Guidelines, set out in Annexure I of the circular, are divided into three parts: Part I (General Content โ€” documentation, minimum report content, receivables parameters, and duties to Coordinating Valuer), Part II (Asset-Specific Valuation Report Formats for Land & Building, Plant & Machinery, and Securities or Financial Assets), and Part III (Guidelines for the Coordinating Valuer for determination of the Fair Value of the Corporate Debtor). This circular operationalises the mandate given by amendments to multiple IBBI regulations requiring valuers to prepare reports and maintain documentation "as per the format notified by the Board through circular."

๐Ÿ“œ Background โ€” Why IBBI Issued These Guidelines

Valuation reports under the Code are a critical input in every insolvency process โ€” they determine the fair value used by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to evaluate resolution plans, set liquidation benchmarks, and assess whether a resolution plan maximises value. However, the absence of a standardised format historically created inconsistency across valuers, asset classes, and processes. The Board has taken this step to address that gap directly.

โŒ Problem: No Uniform Format

Valuation reports under CIRP, Liquidation, Voluntary Liquidation, PPIRP, and Personal Guarantor Bankruptcy processes had no standardised minimum content requirement. Different valuers adopted different formats, creating incomparable and sometimes inadequate reports that made it difficult for CoCs, resolution professionals, and courts to rely on valuations confidently.

โŒ Problem: No Coordinating Valuer Framework

Three separate asset-class valuers (Land & Building, Plant & Machinery, Securities) produced independent reports, but there was no systematic framework for a Coordinating Valuer to integrate these into a holistic fair value of the Corporate Debtor โ€” capturing synergies, intangibles, and business value over and above the sum of individual assets.

๐Ÿ—๏ธ Regulatory Foundation

Sec 196, IBC 2016
+
Reg 35(1A), CIRP Regs 2016
+
Reg 35(8), Liquidation Regs 2016
+
Reg 3(1)(b), Voluntary Liquidation Regs 2017
=
This Circular (Jun 15, 2026)
Also Applicable Under
Reg 39(1A), PPIRP Regulations, 2021 โ€” for pre-packaged insolvency valuation
Also Applicable Under
Reg 30(5), Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors Bankruptcy Regulations, 2019

๐Ÿ“ Part I โ€” General Content: Documentation, Report Standards & Receivables

(a) Documentation Requirements

Every Registered Valuer must maintain a comprehensive written record of the valuation. Documentation is not merely a back-office exercise โ€” it is the primary mechanism through which a valuer substantiates and demonstrates the soundness of their conclusions. The Guidelines require documentation to:

MANDATORY DOCUMENTATION ELEMENTS
๐Ÿ“‹
Records of communication with the client โ€” including instructions, clarifications, scope agreements, and revisions
๐Ÿ”„
Alternative methodologies considered โ€” including reasons for rejecting approaches not ultimately adopted
๐Ÿ“Š
Additional data and inputs evaluated โ€” market data, comparable transactions, industry reports used or considered
โš ๏ธ
Risks and potential biases identified and addressed โ€” documenting where professional judgment was exercised to navigate uncertainty or bias
โœ…
Valuation quality control procedures applied โ€” internal review steps, peer checks, or other QC measures undertaken before finalising the report
โš ๏ธ Key Documentation Standard

Documentation must "clearly set out the valuation process undertaken and the manner in which valuation risk was identified, assessed, and managed." The standard is functional sufficiency โ€” the record must be detailed enough that an informed reader can understand the scope, work performed, and the basis for all conclusions reached.

(b) Minimum Content of the Valuation Report โ€” 23 Mandatory Items

Every valuation report prepared under the Code must contain at minimum the following 23 items. These apply across all asset classes and all IBC processes:

#Mandatory ItemWhat It Covers
iPurpose and scope of the workWhy the valuation is being done; the boundaries of the assignment
iiDetails of Registered Valuer & Registration NumberName, IBBI registration number, CoP status
iiiDetails of any other experts involvedName, qualifications, role of third-party experts whose inputs were used
ivDisclosure of valuer interest or conflictPersonal, financial, or professional interest; conflict of interest declaration per Companies (RV&V) Rules 2017
vIdentity of Client/appointing authority and other intended usersIRP/RP/Liquidator/Bankruptcy Trustee name and registration; other users e.g. creditors
viIntended useThe purpose for which the report is to be used; restrictions on use by third parties
viiDetails of assets and/or liabilities being valuedDescription of the subject asset(s), including relevant identifiers and legal status
viiiBackground and relevant information about the assetOwnership history, legal status, encumbrances, usage, approvals, development potential
ixValuation currency and measurementsCurrency (INR ordinarily); where foreign currency used, exchange rate, date and source must be disclosed
xValuation Report Identification Number (VRIN)As generated from the IBBI website; must appear in the footer of every page of the report
xiSources of InformationAll data sources relied upon โ€” title documents, market databases, FAR, fixed asset registers etc.
xiiBasis/es and premise(s) of value adoptedUnder IBC: fair value and liquidation value per relevant regulations; premise per applicable Valuation Standards
xiiiValuation Standards followedExplicit statement + specific standards and relevant sections applied
xivValuation Approaches, Methods or Models appliedMarket, Income, Cost approach โ€” each considered; applicability or non-applicability discussed with reasons
xvRelevant discounts and premiumsAll discounts/premiums applied with detailed description and rationale for each adjustment
xviSources and selection of significant data and inputsWhat data was used, where it came from, and why it was selected
xviiDescription of inspections and/or investigationsSite visits, dates, physical observations, interviews, photographic evidence
xviiiSustainability and Functional Factors impacting valuationEnvironmental compliance, ESG factors, regulatory approvals, structural condition, demand-supply
xixSignificant or special assumptions, and/or limiting conditionsAll material assumptions and constraints that affect or limit the scope or reliability of the valuation
xxSpecific reasons for any asset left out or assigned zero valueExplicit justification required โ€” omission or zero valuation cannot be unexplained
xxiFindings of any other experts involvedSummary of third-party expert conclusions that were relied upon
xxiiValue and Rationale for valuationFinal fair value, liquidation value, book value, replacement cost (where cost approach adopted) with supporting rationale
xxiiiCaveats, limitations and disclaimersPer the IBBI (Use of Caveats, Limitations, and Disclaimers in Valuation Reports) Guidelines, 2020

(c) Key Parameters for Valuing Receivables

Receivables โ€” including trade receivables, loans, advances, and tax-related receivables โ€” require special attention in IBC valuations. The Guidelines specify seven parameters that must be considered:

1. Nature of Receivable
Trade receivables, loans, advances, tax receivables including carry-forward losses
2. Credit Risk & Related Party Status
Financial health, solvency status (defaulter, under litigation, insolvent), external credit ratings (if any), related party flag
3. Ageing of Receivables
Categorisation by period outstanding: <3 months, <6 months, 6โ€“12 months, >1 year, etc.
4. Legal Enforceability & Documentation
Secured/unsecured status, disputed/undisputed, enforceable contracts, invoices, acknowledgment of debt, KYC of debtors
5. Past Recovery & Servicing Record
Historical recovery rates from similar receivable types; legal/admin costs; time of recovery
6. Macro & Industry Factors
Sector-specific default trends; economic conditions affecting recoverability
7. Any Other Relevant Parameter
At the registered valuer's professional judgment based on specific receivable characteristics

(d) Duties of Registered Valuers Towards the Coordinating Valuer

SIX MANDATORY DUTIES โ€” EVERY ASSET-CLASS RV TOWARDS COORDINATING VALUER
i.
Provide full assistance and cooperation, including timely sharing of inputs, data, and clarifications required for the Coordinating Valuer's integrated fair value determination
ii.
Comply with the Code, regulations, Companies (Registered Valuers & Valuation) Rules, 2017, and applicable Valuation Standards
iii.
Submit inputs and documents in a timely manner so as not to delay the Coordinating Valuer's final report or the overall CIRP/liquidation timeline
iv.
Ensure all information, data, and assumptions shared are true, correct, complete, and free from material misstatement or omission
v.
Maintain working papers and supporting documentation to substantiate all inputs and analysis shared with the Coordinating Valuer
vi.
Provide additional information or clarifications sought by the Coordinating Valuer without delay

๐Ÿ—๏ธ Part II โ€” Asset-Specific Valuation Report Formats

The Guidelines prescribe three separate valuation report formats โ€” one for each asset class under the IBC valuation framework. Each format includes an Executive Summary followed by detailed sections. All three formats share the same 23-item minimum content structure from Part I, but add class-specific data requirements. Below is a comparison of the key asset-specific features of each format.

๐Ÿ  Land & Building
Asset details must include:
Size, location/address, revenue survey, property circle rate, geographical coordinates, owner/lessor/lessee details, title deed no., legal title status, possession status, boundaries (N/S/E/W), land area, topography, frontage-to-depth ratio

Sources of information:
Title documents, municipal approvals, registered sales data from Sub-Registrar, market quotes, online portals, approved building/layout plans

Sustainability factors:
RERA compliance, zoning/land use conformity, age/structural condition, balance economic life, demand and supply, potential/alternative usage

Special requirement:
Brief details of meetings with CoC members to explain methodology per Reg 35(1)(b), CIRP Regulations
โš™๏ธ Plant & Machinery
Asset details must include:
Machine name/make/capacity (installed & operational), year of manufacture, year of purchase, country of manufacture, date put to use, quantity, units of measurement

Sources of information:
Fixed Asset Register, P&L/Cash Flow/Balance Sheet, maintenance schedules, purchase documents, manufacturer/supplier data, cost indices for reproduction/replacement cost

Sustainability factors:
Environmental/pollution control compliance, safety standards (boiler approvals, factory licence, fire safety), compliance with relevant laws, imported vs. indigenous classification

Inspection details:
Machines verified against Fixed Asset Register; observations on usage, wear & tear, obsolescence; intangibles associated with P&M
๐Ÿ“ˆ Securities / Financial Assets
Asset details must include:
Classification and type (including intangibles), quantity, ownership, issuer details, rights, marketability, legal agreements, financial metrics, regulatory compliance

Sources of information:
Financials of Corporate Debtor, ITRs, TDS statements, GST cash and credit ledgers, shareholding patterns, comparable listed entity data, management discussions with RP

Background must cover:
Loans/advances extended by Corporate Debtor, KYC of debtors, intangibles (goodwill, IP, licences, domain names), inventories, receivables (nature, age, recovery trends)

Sustainability factors:
ESG compliance, governance (promoter integrity, board strength, audit history), major customer/supplier relationships, future outlook and strategy
๐Ÿ“Œ Common Across All Three Formats

All three formats require: (a) an Executive Summary table with fair value, liquidation value, IRP/RP/Liquidator details, valuation date, inspection date, report date, VRIN, and CoP status; (b) the VRIN to appear in the footer of every page; (c) both Fair Value and Liquidation Value to be stated; (d) replacement cost to be disclosed where the cost approach was adopted; and (e) caveats, limitations and disclaimers per the IBBI Guidelines 2020.

๐Ÿ”— Part III โ€” Coordinating Valuer: Fair Value of the Corporate Debtor as a Whole

Part III introduces a comprehensive framework for the Coordinating Valuer โ€” the designated registered valuer responsible for integrating the three asset-class valuations into a single, holistic determination of the Fair Value of the Corporate Debtor (FVCD). This is the most significant new governance element in the Guidelines.

WHO IS THE COORDINATING VALUER & HOW ARE THEY DESIGNATED?
Who
Designated by the Insolvency Professional in consultation with the Committee of Creditors from amongst the Registered Valuers appointed for the set of asset classes. The appointment must be made sufficiently early in the valuation process to enable effective coordination.
How
Formalised through a written engagement letter from the Insolvency Professional specifying scope, responsibilities, deliverables, reporting requirements, timelines, confidentiality obligations, and any special assumptions or limitations.
When
The Coordinating Valuer must meet the Committee of Creditors to explain the methodology before computation of estimates as required under the relevant regulations. Timelines are as per the engagement letter or applicable regulations.

๐Ÿ”ข THE FAIR VALUE INTEGRATION FORMULA (Para 5.4.2)

FVCD = ฮฃ(VRV) + S
FVCD
Fair Value of the Corporate Debtor โ€” the integrated, holistic value as a going business concern
ฮฃ(VRV)
Sum of fair values of individual asset classes (Land & Building + Plant & Machinery + Securities/Financial Assets) determined by the respective Registered Valuers
S (Synergistic Adjustment)
Additional value from integrated operations: operational efficiencies, business synergies, market positioning, intangible assets, and expected future earning potential

Scope of Work of the Coordinating Valuer

FIVE CORE FUNCTIONS
5.1
Report of Asset Class Valuations
Consider and review the valuation reports submitted by all three Registered Valuers (Land & Building, Plant & Machinery, Securities/Financial Assets).
5.2
Determination of Fair Value โ€” Business as a Whole
Not a mere aggregation of asset values, but a holistic assessment considering: (a) operating business of the Corporate Debtor; (b) expected future cash flows; (c) industry outlook and macro conditions; (d) business synergies from integrated operations; and (e) tangible and intangible assets.
5.3
Treatment of Intangible Assets
Assess presence and contribution of intangible assets that may significantly influence FVCD, including: brand value, trademarks/copyrights, patents/proprietary technology, licences/regulatory approvals, customer relationships and contracts, distribution networks, and goodwill/reputation. The basis for identification, recognition, and valuation must be clearly documented.
5.4
Integration of Valuation Outputs
Integrate asset-level valuation reports considering tangible assets, intangible assets, and synergies to arrive at the FVCD using the formula: FVCD = ฮฃ(VRV) + S. The synergistic adjustment 'S' reflects operational efficiencies, business synergies, market positioning, and future earning potential.
7
Coordinating Valuation Report
Prepare a final Coordinating Valuation Report containing: background and purpose; details of RVs whose reports were considered; methodologies applied; key assumptions; assessment of holistic value and synergies; treatment of tangibles and intangibles; basis of integration; data sources; and final FVCD estimate. Executive summary in the format of Annexure A to Part III.

๐Ÿ“‹ Before vs. After: What These Guidelines Change

AspectBefore (Pre Jun 15, 2026)After (From Jun 15, 2026)
Valuation report formatNo standardised minimum content; valuer-specific formats; inconsistency across processes23 mandatory items for all reports; asset-specific templates with Executive Summary prescribed
VRIN requirementNo mandatory placement requirementVRIN mandatory in footer of every page of every valuation report
Zero-value / omitted assetsOmissions not always explained; zero values without justification possibleSpecific reasons mandatory for every asset left out or assigned zero value
Receivables valuationNo prescribed parameters; valuer-driven approachSeven specific parameters prescribed (nature, credit risk, ageing, enforceability, recovery record, macro factors, others)
Fair Value of Corporate Debtor (as a whole)No formal Coordinating Valuer framework; no synergy capture; typically sum of individual asset valuesFormal Coordinating Valuer role; formula FVCD = ฮฃ(VRV) + S; mandatory synergy and intangible assessment
Intangible asset treatmentInconsistent recognition; often missed in asset-class valuationsMandatory assessment by Coordinating Valuer; 7 specific categories listed; documentation basis required
CoC methodology briefingRequired under Reg 35(1)(b) CIRP Regs but not detailed in formatMinutes of CoC meetings now mandatory annexure in all three report formats; Coordinating Valuer must meet CoC before computing estimates
Replacement cost disclosureNo uniform requirementMandatory where cost approach adopted; asset-wise replacement cost must be stated
Duty of RVs to Coordinating ValuerNo formal codified obligationSix statutory duties prescribed โ€” timely sharing, accuracy, working paper maintenance, cooperation, compliance

๐Ÿ“Š Impact Analysis โ€” Who Is Affected and What Changes

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Registered Valuers (RVs)

Must revamp all valuation report templates immediately. Every report needs 23 minimum items, VRIN on every page, and mandatory annexures including CoC meeting minutes. New duties towards the Coordinating Valuer create collaborative obligations within each valuation set.

๐Ÿ”— Coordinating Valuers

Now carry a significantly expanded mandate. Beyond summarising asset values, they must actively assess synergies, intangibles, future cash flows, and business value. The FVCD = ฮฃ(VRV) + S formula creates formal accountability for capturing and documenting the synergy component.

โš–๏ธ Resolution Professionals / IPs

Must now issue formal written engagement letters to Coordinating Valuers with specified contents. Also responsible for ensuring Coordinating Valuer designation happens early enough in the process โ€” late designation creates coordination risk.

๐Ÿฆ Committee of Creditors

Benefit from standardised, more comprehensive valuation reports โ€” enabling better-informed resolution plan evaluation. CoC now has a structured pre-computation methodology briefing from both asset-class RVs and the Coordinating Valuer, improving transparency.

๐Ÿ“‹ Registered Valuer Organisations (RVOs)

Must update training curriculum, model templates, and quality review frameworks to align with the new 23-item minimum content standard. Members need upskilling on the receivables parameters, sustainability factors, and Coordinating Valuer obligations.

๐Ÿ›๏ธ NCLT / Adjudicating Authority

Standardised reports with mandatory VRIN, conflict disclosures, and documented methodologies will make valuation challenges before the NCLT more structured. The requirement to justify zero values and omissions removes a common source of dispute.

โœ… Compliance Action Points

  • โœ… Registered Valuers โ€” Immediate template update: Revise all existing valuation report templates to incorporate the 23 mandatory minimum content items. Add the VRIN to the footer of every report page. Ensure templates for all three asset classes (L&B, P&M, Securities) include the Executive Summary table in the format specified in Part II.
  • โœ… Zero-value and omission documentation: For every asset excluded from valuation or assigned a nil value, prepare a documented justification that will appear as a specific section in the report. This is now a mandatory item (item xx) โ€” silence or unexplained omissions are non-compliant.
  • โœ… Receivables checklist: For all assignments involving receivables, build a structured checklist covering the seven prescribed parameters: nature, credit risk/related party status, ageing, legal enforceability, past recovery record, macro/industry factors, and any other relevant parameter. Maintain this as part of the working paper documentation.
  • โœ… CoC meeting minutes โ€” mandatory annexure: All three asset-specific report formats now require minutes of meetings held with the Committee of Creditors to explain valuation methodology. Ensure these meetings are held, minuted, and the minutes annexed to the final valuation report.
  • โœ… Coordinating Valuer engagement: Resolution Professionals must issue written engagement letters to the designated Coordinating Valuer covering all items specified in the Guidelines (scope, responsibilities, timeline, deliverables, confidentiality, special assumptions). The Coordinating Valuer must be designated early โ€” not after individual asset reports are complete.
  • โœ… Synergy and intangible assessment โ€” Coordinating Valuer: Assess and document the synergistic adjustment 'S' in the FVCD formula. Review whether intangibles (brand, patents, licences, customer contracts, distribution networks, goodwill) are present and if so, assess their contribution to value. Clearly document the identification, recognition, and valuation basis for each intangible.
  • โœ… Replacement cost disclosure: Where the cost approach is used for any asset class, disclose the asset-wise replacement cost as on the valuation date, in addition to fair value and liquidation value.
  • โœ… Registered Valuer Organisations: Update IBBI-mandated training programmes, examination syllabi, and model templates to reflect the new format and documentation requirements. Members who are currently in active IBC assignments should be briefed that these guidelines apply to all valuations conducted after June 15, 2026.
Applicability Across IBC Processes

These Guidelines apply to all valuations conducted under the Code from June 15, 2026 โ€” not just CIRP. This includes valuations in Liquidation proceedings (Regulation 35(8), Liquidation Process Regulations), Voluntary Liquidation (Regulation 3(1)(b), Voluntary Liquidation Process Regulations 2017), Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (Regulation 39(1A), PPIRP Regulations 2021), and Personal Guarantor Bankruptcy (Regulation 30(5), Bankruptcy Process for Personal Guarantors Regulations 2019).

Sources: IBBI Circular No. IBBI/RV/103/2026 dated June 15, 2026 | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 โ€” Section 196 | IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 โ€” Regulation 35 | IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 โ€” Regulation 35 | IBBI (Voluntary Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2017 โ€” Regulation 3 | IBBI (Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2021 โ€” Regulation 39 | IBBI (Bankruptcy Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Regulations, 2019 โ€” Regulation 30 | Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, 2017 | IBBI (Use of Caveats, Limitations, and Disclaimers in Valuation Reports) Guidelines, 2020 | ibbi.gov.in

This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional valuation advice. Verify all details against the official IBBI circular and applicable regulations before relying on this content for any purpose.

Related Updates

IBBI Information Utilities Regulations, 2017: Full Guide to June 2026 Amendments
IBCHigh impact

IBBI Information Utilities Regulations, 2017: Full Guide to June 2026 Amendments

The IBBI (Information Utilities) Regulations, 2017 establish the legal framework for Information Utilities in India. Amended up to 02 June 2026, the regulations govern registration, governance, authentication of defaults, issuance of Records of Default, & introduce the new concept of Info of Dispute

IBBI (Information Utilities) Regulations, 2017 (Amended upto 02-06-2026)

15 June 2026Eff. 2 June 202618 views
39 min
IBBI Personal Guarantor IRP Regulations 2019 โ€“ Complete Guide [Amended up to 2 June 2026]
IBCHigh impact

IBBI Personal Guarantor IRP Regulations 2019 โ€“ Complete Guide [Amended up to 2 June 2026]

The IBBI has overhauled the Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors Regulations, 2019 through REG149, effective 2 June 2026. New Reg 6A mandates detailed asset disclosure, Reg 11A coordinates asset transfers under Section 28A, Reg 17B is tightened, and Forms Aโ€“C move to circular format

IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Regulations, 2019 (Amended upto 02-06-2026)

14 June 2026Eff. 2 June 202636 views
37 min
IBC Amendment Act 2026: Complete Guide โ€” Creditor-Initiated IRP, Group Insolvency, New Timelines & Key Changes
IBCHigh impact

IBC Amendment Act 2026: Complete Guide โ€” Creditor-Initiated IRP, Group Insolvency, New Timelines & Key Changes

The IBC Amendment Act 2026 (No. 6 of 2026) introduces a new Creditor-Initiated IRP, Group Insolvency, Cross-Border Insolvency framework, strict AA timelines, CoC oversight of liquidation, dissenting FC protection, licence preservation post-resolution, and enhanced penalty provisions.

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 โ€” Gazette of India CG-DL-E-06042026-271594

3 May 2026Eff. 6 April 2026197 views
22 min