๐ Key Facts at a Glance
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has issued Circular No. IBBI/RV/103/2026 dated June 15, 2026, specifying comprehensive Guidelines for Conducting Valuation Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the "Guidelines"). The circular, signed by B. Sankaranarayanan, General Manager, is addressed to all Registered Valuers, Registered Valuer Entities, Registered Valuer Organisations, Registered Insolvency Professionals, Registered Insolvency Professional Entities, and Registered Insolvency Professional Agencies. It comes into force with immediate effect and applies to all valuations conducted under the Code thereafter.
The Guidelines, set out in Annexure I of the circular, are divided into three parts: Part I (General Content โ documentation, minimum report content, receivables parameters, and duties to Coordinating Valuer), Part II (Asset-Specific Valuation Report Formats for Land & Building, Plant & Machinery, and Securities or Financial Assets), and Part III (Guidelines for the Coordinating Valuer for determination of the Fair Value of the Corporate Debtor). This circular operationalises the mandate given by amendments to multiple IBBI regulations requiring valuers to prepare reports and maintain documentation "as per the format notified by the Board through circular."
๐ Background โ Why IBBI Issued These Guidelines
Valuation reports under the Code are a critical input in every insolvency process โ they determine the fair value used by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to evaluate resolution plans, set liquidation benchmarks, and assess whether a resolution plan maximises value. However, the absence of a standardised format historically created inconsistency across valuers, asset classes, and processes. The Board has taken this step to address that gap directly.
Valuation reports under CIRP, Liquidation, Voluntary Liquidation, PPIRP, and Personal Guarantor Bankruptcy processes had no standardised minimum content requirement. Different valuers adopted different formats, creating incomparable and sometimes inadequate reports that made it difficult for CoCs, resolution professionals, and courts to rely on valuations confidently.
Three separate asset-class valuers (Land & Building, Plant & Machinery, Securities) produced independent reports, but there was no systematic framework for a Coordinating Valuer to integrate these into a holistic fair value of the Corporate Debtor โ capturing synergies, intangibles, and business value over and above the sum of individual assets.
๐๏ธ Regulatory Foundation
๐ Part I โ General Content: Documentation, Report Standards & Receivables
(a) Documentation Requirements
Every Registered Valuer must maintain a comprehensive written record of the valuation. Documentation is not merely a back-office exercise โ it is the primary mechanism through which a valuer substantiates and demonstrates the soundness of their conclusions. The Guidelines require documentation to:
Documentation must "clearly set out the valuation process undertaken and the manner in which valuation risk was identified, assessed, and managed." The standard is functional sufficiency โ the record must be detailed enough that an informed reader can understand the scope, work performed, and the basis for all conclusions reached.
(b) Minimum Content of the Valuation Report โ 23 Mandatory Items
Every valuation report prepared under the Code must contain at minimum the following 23 items. These apply across all asset classes and all IBC processes:
(c) Key Parameters for Valuing Receivables
Receivables โ including trade receivables, loans, advances, and tax-related receivables โ require special attention in IBC valuations. The Guidelines specify seven parameters that must be considered:
(d) Duties of Registered Valuers Towards the Coordinating Valuer
๐๏ธ Part II โ Asset-Specific Valuation Report Formats
The Guidelines prescribe three separate valuation report formats โ one for each asset class under the IBC valuation framework. Each format includes an Executive Summary followed by detailed sections. All three formats share the same 23-item minimum content structure from Part I, but add class-specific data requirements. Below is a comparison of the key asset-specific features of each format.
All three formats require: (a) an Executive Summary table with fair value, liquidation value, IRP/RP/Liquidator details, valuation date, inspection date, report date, VRIN, and CoP status; (b) the VRIN to appear in the footer of every page; (c) both Fair Value and Liquidation Value to be stated; (d) replacement cost to be disclosed where the cost approach was adopted; and (e) caveats, limitations and disclaimers per the IBBI Guidelines 2020.
๐ Part III โ Coordinating Valuer: Fair Value of the Corporate Debtor as a Whole
Part III introduces a comprehensive framework for the Coordinating Valuer โ the designated registered valuer responsible for integrating the three asset-class valuations into a single, holistic determination of the Fair Value of the Corporate Debtor (FVCD). This is the most significant new governance element in the Guidelines.
๐ข THE FAIR VALUE INTEGRATION FORMULA (Para 5.4.2)
Scope of Work of the Coordinating Valuer
๐ Before vs. After: What These Guidelines Change
๐ Impact Analysis โ Who Is Affected and What Changes
๐๏ธ Registered Valuers (RVs)
Must revamp all valuation report templates immediately. Every report needs 23 minimum items, VRIN on every page, and mandatory annexures including CoC meeting minutes. New duties towards the Coordinating Valuer create collaborative obligations within each valuation set.
๐ Coordinating Valuers
Now carry a significantly expanded mandate. Beyond summarising asset values, they must actively assess synergies, intangibles, future cash flows, and business value. The FVCD = ฮฃ(VRV) + S formula creates formal accountability for capturing and documenting the synergy component.
โ๏ธ Resolution Professionals / IPs
Must now issue formal written engagement letters to Coordinating Valuers with specified contents. Also responsible for ensuring Coordinating Valuer designation happens early enough in the process โ late designation creates coordination risk.
๐ฆ Committee of Creditors
Benefit from standardised, more comprehensive valuation reports โ enabling better-informed resolution plan evaluation. CoC now has a structured pre-computation methodology briefing from both asset-class RVs and the Coordinating Valuer, improving transparency.
๐ Registered Valuer Organisations (RVOs)
Must update training curriculum, model templates, and quality review frameworks to align with the new 23-item minimum content standard. Members need upskilling on the receivables parameters, sustainability factors, and Coordinating Valuer obligations.
๐๏ธ NCLT / Adjudicating Authority
Standardised reports with mandatory VRIN, conflict disclosures, and documented methodologies will make valuation challenges before the NCLT more structured. The requirement to justify zero values and omissions removes a common source of dispute.
โ Compliance Action Points
- โ Registered Valuers โ Immediate template update: Revise all existing valuation report templates to incorporate the 23 mandatory minimum content items. Add the VRIN to the footer of every report page. Ensure templates for all three asset classes (L&B, P&M, Securities) include the Executive Summary table in the format specified in Part II.
- โ Zero-value and omission documentation: For every asset excluded from valuation or assigned a nil value, prepare a documented justification that will appear as a specific section in the report. This is now a mandatory item (item xx) โ silence or unexplained omissions are non-compliant.
- โ Receivables checklist: For all assignments involving receivables, build a structured checklist covering the seven prescribed parameters: nature, credit risk/related party status, ageing, legal enforceability, past recovery record, macro/industry factors, and any other relevant parameter. Maintain this as part of the working paper documentation.
- โ CoC meeting minutes โ mandatory annexure: All three asset-specific report formats now require minutes of meetings held with the Committee of Creditors to explain valuation methodology. Ensure these meetings are held, minuted, and the minutes annexed to the final valuation report.
- โ Coordinating Valuer engagement: Resolution Professionals must issue written engagement letters to the designated Coordinating Valuer covering all items specified in the Guidelines (scope, responsibilities, timeline, deliverables, confidentiality, special assumptions). The Coordinating Valuer must be designated early โ not after individual asset reports are complete.
- โ Synergy and intangible assessment โ Coordinating Valuer: Assess and document the synergistic adjustment 'S' in the FVCD formula. Review whether intangibles (brand, patents, licences, customer contracts, distribution networks, goodwill) are present and if so, assess their contribution to value. Clearly document the identification, recognition, and valuation basis for each intangible.
- โ Replacement cost disclosure: Where the cost approach is used for any asset class, disclose the asset-wise replacement cost as on the valuation date, in addition to fair value and liquidation value.
- โ Registered Valuer Organisations: Update IBBI-mandated training programmes, examination syllabi, and model templates to reflect the new format and documentation requirements. Members who are currently in active IBC assignments should be briefed that these guidelines apply to all valuations conducted after June 15, 2026.
These Guidelines apply to all valuations conducted under the Code from June 15, 2026 โ not just CIRP. This includes valuations in Liquidation proceedings (Regulation 35(8), Liquidation Process Regulations), Voluntary Liquidation (Regulation 3(1)(b), Voluntary Liquidation Process Regulations 2017), Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (Regulation 39(1A), PPIRP Regulations 2021), and Personal Guarantor Bankruptcy (Regulation 30(5), Bankruptcy Process for Personal Guarantors Regulations 2019).
This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional valuation advice. Verify all details against the official IBBI circular and applicable regulations before relying on this content for any purpose.

![IBBI Personal Guarantor IRP Regulations 2019 โ Complete Guide [Amended up to 2 June 2026]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2F5gCqjPnG%2Fibbi-personal-guarantor-insolvency-irp-regulations-2019-amended-june-2026.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
