Quick Answer
On 7 October 2026, the Reserve Bank of India issued four amendment directions (RBI/2026-27/286, 287, 288 and 289) that replace the QCCP clearing-member risk-weight sub-paragraph in the 2025 capital adequacy Directions for Commercial Banks, Small Finance Banks, Payments Banks and All India Financial Institutions (AIFIs). The replacement text applies a 2 per cent risk weight to a clearing member's trade exposure to a QCCP in OTC derivatives, exchange traded derivatives and SFTs. For Commercial Banks, the Twelfth Amendment Directions also revise the treatment of incurred CVA losses. All four directions are effective from 7 October 2026.
Quick Reference
All four circulars are dated 7 October 2026, are signed by Sunil T S Nair, Chief General Manager, and state that they align the existing Directions with international standards.
What Changed?
RBI has replaced one sub-paragraph in each entity's 2025 capital adequacy Directions. The Commercial Banks Directions get a second change on incurred CVA losses.
Note on the "old position": The circulars reproduce only the replacement text, not the sub-paragraphs they replace. They describe the earlier provisions as dealing with the requirement for clearing member banks to obtain a legal opinion. A precise old-versus-new comparison therefore needs the 2025 Directions open alongside this article.
Why Are RBI Directions 286–289 Grouped Together?
RBI/2026-27/286 to RBI/2026-27/289 use the same operative wording for the QCCP risk-weight sub-paragraph, with differences reflecting the entity name ("bank" or "AIFI"), paragraph numbers and enabling statute. RBI states that the amendments follow a review intended to align the existing Directions with international standards.
Circular 285 of the same date, the Commercial Banks (Miscellaneous) Amendment Directions, 2026, is a separate matter. It deletes Sub-section D of Chapter IV (Paragraph 38) on deferment of option premium, effective 1 April 2027, and is not covered here.
A QCCP is a central counterparty that stands between the two sides of a derivatives or securities financing trade. A clearing member is a bank or institution that clears trades through it. A risk weight decides how much capital a bank must hold against an exposure. The lower the risk weight, the less capital the exposure consumes.
Who Must Comply With the Revised Framework?
The revised QCCP risk-weight provision applies where a bank or AIFI acts as a clearing member of a QCCP. The separate incurred CVA loss amendment in paragraph 213(2)(iv)(b)(i) is a Commercial Banks amendment and is not stated to be limited to QCCP clearing-member activity. The four amendment directions do not specify a separate exemption from the revised QCCP risk-weight provision.
What Is the QCCP Risk Weight Under the Revised Provision?
A clearing member that acts for its own purposes must apply a 2 per cent risk weight to its trade exposure to the QCCP in respect of OTC derivatives transactions, exchange traded derivatives transactions and SFTs.
Where the clearing member offers clearing services to clients, the 2 per cent risk weight also applies to the clearing member's trade exposure to the QCCP that arises where it is obligated to reimburse the client for any losses on such transactions in the event that the QCCP defaults.
Bank X clears an OTC derivative through a QCCP in its own name. It also clears a client's trade and has agreed to reimburse the client for losses if the QCCP defaults. Under the revised text, Bank X applies 2% to its own trade exposure to the QCCP. It applies the same 2% to the exposure arising from the reimbursement obligation to the client.
Practical interpretation: The replacement text as reproduced in the circulars contains no condition relating to a legal opinion. The circulars describe the earlier provision as dealing with the legal-opinion requirement, so clearing members should check the 2025 Directions to confirm what has fallen away and whether any related requirement survives in another paragraph.
How Is an Incurred CVA Loss Now Treated for Commercial Banks?
For Commercial Banks, paragraph 213(2)(iv)(b)(i) now provides that, for determining exposure at default (EAD), the CVA loss is the CVA recognised by the bank as an incurred write-down. The bank uses the amount recognised in its financial statements under its applicable accounting and valuation policies.
- The reduction in EAD for incurred CVA loss is calculated without taking into account any offsetting debit valuation adjustments (DVAs) that have been deducted from capital.
- The reduction in EAD does not apply for determining the CVA risk capital requirement.
- The bank must maintain adequate documentation showing the amount of CVA included as an incurred write-down and its reconciliation to the financial statements.
- Paragraph 213(2)(iv)(c), (d) and (e) are deleted.
CVA (credit valuation adjustment) reflects the counterparty credit risk on derivatives. An incurred write-down is a CVA loss already booked in the accounts. The rule lets a bank reduce EAD only by the amount actually recognised in its books, and it must be able to show the working.
The circular does not reproduce the text of the deleted paragraphs (c), (d) and (e), so their earlier content should be checked in the 2025 Directions.
When Do the Amendments Apply?
Legal Basis
The directions for Commercial Banks, Small Finance Banks and Payments Banks are issued under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The AIFI direction is issued under Section 45L of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. Each recites that RBI is satisfied that the amendment is necessary and expedient in the public interest.
Compliance Checklist
Responsible functions below are practical suggestions; the circulars do not assign them.
CorpLawUpdates Analysis
For compliance teams, the immediate issue is the lack of any transition window: the changes apply from the date of issue. An entity with open QCCP exposures, or a Commercial Bank with CVA write-downs in its books, needs to confirm that its current capital computation already matches the new text.
The CVA documentation requirement is a key implementation point because the bank must maintain adequate documentation showing the amount of CVA included as an incurred write-down and its reconciliation to the financial statements.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did RBI change on QCCP exposures on 7 October 2026?
RBI replaced the QCCP clearing-member risk-weight sub-paragraph in the 2025 capital adequacy Directions for Commercial Banks, Small Finance Banks, Payments Banks and AIFIs. The new text applies a 2 per cent risk weight to a clearing member's trade exposure to a QCCP in OTC derivatives, exchange traded derivatives and SFTs.
Which entities are covered?
Commercial Banks (RBI/2026-27/286), Small Finance Banks (287), Payments Banks (288) and All India Financial Institutions (289), where they act as clearing members of a QCCP.
When do the amendments come into force?
All four amendment directions come into effect from the date of issue, 7 October 2026. The circulars give no transition period.
Does the 2% risk weight apply to client clearing?
Yes, in a specific case. The 2 per cent risk weight applies to the clearing member's trade exposure to the QCCP that arises where the clearing member is obligated to reimburse the client for losses on such transactions if the QCCP defaults.
What changed on incurred CVA losses?
For Commercial Banks, RBI replaced paragraph 213(2)(iv)(b)(i). The CVA loss for determining EAD is the CVA recognised as an incurred write-down, based on the amount in the bank's financial statements. The reduction in EAD ignores offsetting DVAs deducted from capital and does not apply to the CVA risk capital requirement.
Do the CVA changes apply to Small Finance Banks, Payments Banks or AIFIs?
No. The CVA amendment and the deletion of paragraph 213(2)(iv)(c), (d) and (e) appear only in the Commercial Banks Twelfth Amendment Directions (RBI/2026-27/286).
What documentation must Commercial Banks maintain for incurred CVA losses?
A Commercial Bank must maintain adequate documentation demonstrating the amount of CVA included as an incurred write-down and its reconciliation to the financial statements.
Is RBI circular 285 part of this change?
No. RBI/2026-27/285 amends the Commercial Banks (Miscellaneous) Directions, 2025 by deleting Sub-section D of Chapter IV (Paragraph 38) on deferment of option premium, effective 1 April 2027. It is a separate amendment.
Related but Separate RBI Update: RBI/2026-27/284
Source Note
- Reserve Bank of India (Commercial Banks – Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy) Twelfth Amendment Directions, 2026: RBI/2026-27/286, DOR.MRG.REC.No.242/00-00-001/2026-27, 7 October 2026
- Reserve Bank of India (Small Finance Banks – Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy) Sixth Amendment Directions, 2026: RBI/2026-27/287, DOR.MRG.REC.No.243/00-00-001/2026-27, 7 October 2026
- Reserve Bank of India (Payments Banks – Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy) Third Amendment Directions, 2026: RBI/2026-27/288, DOR.MRG.REC.No.244/00-00-001/2026-27, 7 October 2026
- Reserve Bank of India (All India Financial Institutions (AIFIs) – Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy) Fifth Amendment Directions, 2026: RBI/2026-27/289, DOR.MRG.REC.No.245/21-01-002/2026-27, 7 October 2026
- Issuing authority: Reserve Bank of India. Signatory on all four: Sunil T S Nair, Chief General Manager.
- Primary source: Reserve Bank of India website (www.rbi.org.in)
This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or regulatory advice. Readers should verify the applicable primary regulatory source before taking action.


